On the Subject of Everyone Being Wrong at Once
On the Subject of Everyone Being Wrong at Once
[Remarks, as prepared for an LP call. Read in full, without interruption.]
Good morning. I want to talk about hedges, because none of yours worked last week, and I'd rather explain that to you now than watch you discover it in the Q3 letter.
Start with gold. You bought it in the spring because Kevin Warsh doesn't return your calls and the Strait of Hormuz was a headline generator. Gold was supposed to be the thing that works when the Fed is dangerously data-dependent and Iran is a wildcard. Instead it's down 0.55% on the week, off 5.39% year-to-date, and it cannot break its own downtrend even with three FOMC dissents on the hawkish side and Trump telling reporters from the Oval Office that talks with Tehran are a "last chance before decapitation." That's not ambient noise. That's the exact cocktail gold was invented for, and gold shrugged.
Now duration. You bought long bonds, or you sold them, depending on which desk briefed you, on the theory that the 30-year at 5.23% was either a generational entry point or a widow-maker short. This week it rallied — 30s down about five basis points, 10s down closer to five, Bunds and Gilts both bid — which in isolation reads dovish. Except Chair Warsh's committee just delivered three dissents on the hawkish side, year-end rate projections are sitting at 3.6% to 4.1%, and the market is still pricing two more hikes before December. You are long duration into a Fed that has told you, with unusual clarity, that it isn't finished. Ask yourself who's mispricing whom.
Then there's the sector that was supposed to be the safest trade in the book: utilities, bought as a bond proxy, a dividend compounder, a place to hide. Down 4.21% for the week. One of the worst weekly prints for the group all year. REITs, same story, down 2.27% via the NAREIT composite. These are the assets that were supposed to benefit from a dovish pivot narrative that half of this market was still pricing as recently as ten days ago. The pivot didn't come. The rate-sensitive trade got run over by a train it insisted wasn't scheduled.
Meanwhile the actual risk-on complex is doing the opposite of what the fixed income market is telling you to expect. The Nasdaq wobbled Friday — down 3.2% on a session with 131 new 52-week lows against just 52 new highs, which is not a healthy breadth number, write that down — and then Monday it turned around and ripped, tech-led, on renewed Iran talks and sliding oil. Crude fell roughly 5%, Brent close behind, and CoreWeave — a company that exists to rent you a GPU — traded up more than 18% in a single session ahead of earnings it hasn't even reported yet. That's not a company being repriced on fundamentals. That's a crowd deciding, again, that the AI capex story survives contact with a Fed that is telling anyone who will listen that inflation has sat above target for five straight years and June's CPI improvement was gasoline, not services, not the durable kind.
Bitcoin, for what it's worth, did none of this. It sat. Low $60s to mid-$60s, chopping against its 50-day, still underneath the 200-day, still the asset everyone describes as a hedge against exactly the environment we are currently in — hawkish central bank, war premium, currency stress — and still the asset that has spent the entire event refusing to hedge anything. ETF outflows in June ran to $4.4 billion, the worst month of the year for the wrapper that was supposed to be institutional legitimization. If bitcoin is digital gold, it picked a strange week to trade like neither gold nor an asset with conviction in either direction.
Here is the thing I actually want you to sit with. Every one of these trades was constructed on a coherent thesis. Gold as geopolitical and monetary hedge. Utilities as bond proxy. Duration as dovish bet. Bitcoin as everything-hedge. Equities, specifically the AI complex, as the pure risk-on expression of a soft landing. All five were reasonable positions in isolation. This week, four of the five theses failed simultaneously, and the fifth — the risk-on equity trade — is the one still standing, propped up almost entirely by a single sector's capex story and a ceasefire that Iran itself denies is being negotiated.
That is not diversification working. That is correlation collapsing in a way that leaves you exposed exactly when you thought you'd built a portfolio that couldn't be. The VIX fell 6.4% to 15.99 on Friday, which tells you the market agrees with none of what I just said — it thinks the coast is clear, the vol is cheap, and the hedges you're holding are still hedges.
I'd like to be wrong about this. History says the week the option market gets complacent and every traditional hedge fails at once is usually not the week you want to have been long the thing that's still working. Position accordingly, and I'll see you at the next call, assuming CoreWeave's print doesn't move the date up.
Upvoted! Thank you for supporting witness @jswit.
Vote weight boost from @jsup (+5.0%p)
I loved how you tied the market's behavior to real-world events, it made the analysis feel even more visceral and relatable. 💡