You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: CineAtlas 60 | Week 1 — One Take Intro | [Feni]
Evaluation — CineAtlas 60 (Week 1: One Take Intro)
Post: @boishakhi123 — “CineAtlas 60 | Week 1 — One Take Intro | Feni” (Feni Book Fair)
Evaluation Summary (Week 1)
| Criteria (Rubric /10) | Score | Short comments |
|---|---|---|
| 1) Weekly rule respected (One Take + 20–60s + required links) / 3 | 0.0 / 3.0 | No video is included in the post excerpt (Week 1 requires a 20–60s one-take micro-film + required links). |
| 2) Story clarity & creativity / 2 | 1.3 / 2.0 | The place is clear (annual book fair) with descriptive detail; however, Week 1 expects a short “intro story/mood” tied to the one-take film. |
| 3) Video execution (framing, stability, sound clarity) / 2 | 0.0 / 2.0 | Not applicable because no video is provided. |
| 4) SteemAtlas pin quality (relevant description + correct location) / 1 | 1.0 / 1.0 | Pin + coordinates + place name are complete and clear. |
| 5) Presentation (stills/screenshots, clean structure) / 1 | 1.0 / 1.0 | Many photos, clean layout, and good informational structure. |
| 6) Engagement (Shot Breakdown comments on others) / 1 | 0.0 / 1.0 | No proof links to two Shot Breakdown comments included in the excerpt. |
Final Score: 3.3 / 10
General Comment
As a photo-based location post, this is well presented: the book fair is clearly documented, the SteemAtlas pin is correct, and the photo coverage is strong. However, CineAtlas Week 1 is primarily a micro-film challenge: without the required 20–60 second one-take video (and the required video links), the entry loses most of the available points. Adding a simple one-take walkthrough (entrance → a key stall → crowd moment → closing frame) plus two Shot Breakdown comments on other entries would dramatically raise the score.