You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Terrorists, homegrown and hearing voices.
Stop upvoting people instantly with 0.02% upvotes... this is extremely anoying because this way you are hindering the growth of alot of steemit users.
So just stop using that programm to upvote everyone in a few seconds... because if you keep on doing it ill make sure to downvote each and everyone of your posts. Something which I dont want to do!
So just stop man, its anoying and extremely sad
just let him do him. this doesnt have any negative effect on anyone. hes not holding alot of steem, hes not putting 100% votes. and hes not downvoting anyone.
While i dont agree with his message or some of the things he says, upvoting people when they post is not going to have any negative efffects on anyone, if anything it gives the small guy a chance to get a vote.
that being said, Squibe i think your almost this close to making our point for us with this post, but you just have a different reasoning for all of these people.
Hearing a voice in your head be it taylor swift using netflix to spy on a 18 year old man
or obama trying to broadcast a womans life on national tv.
was taylor swift on a computer watching this guy sleeping?
were there any camera crews outside the house. and did the footage ever make it online?
no because they were things the brain told them.
I really need you to clear this up for me because its vital to me understanding this.
is it known by these people that these things are not really happening but just a byproduct of the voice?
Cant it be possible that the voice is also an illusion caused by something else?
But thats the problem...it DOES have a negative effect on people...by upvoting right after me posting the post the upvoters earn way less because a part of the $ is returned to the blockchain instead of going to the people that upvote the post.
I do appreciate the upvotes ofcourse but its just anoying that he upvotes everything after just a few seconds.
@royw, agree 100 %. He use some apps like steemauto upvote, and vote my post in second. That really anoying me, except I have no upvote yet. I don't want people to think that he is a part of me or working with me. Is there a way to stop him from doing it?
Same here...its just really annoying but i guess he wont stop because he just likes being a pain the butt lol
I dont think there is a way to stop him directly but im already downvoting each and every post that he makes so for the time that hes being anoying atleast he is not earning anything from steemit
Yeah, I just follow your way too, to downvote anything his post.
Sadly he doesnt post that much... another fucker is doing the same and he basically earns nothing now....hopefully they will stop this bullshit ;)
Yeah, hopefully.
that was my fear. My guess is he is leaving steem and this is his way of keeping his legacy going here.
I honestly mean the guy no harm and hopefully hes doing okay but Otherwise your only best bet would be to ignore it. I promise you if his 1 percent could steal everyones vote ... then whales would do it. its just a way for him to send out potential links back to his profile...
Its a very sad thing, His determination and creativity are truly impressive, too bad he couldnt channel that into something other then him - punishing us for not having the same visualisation of reality... i wish he could understand everyones got their own lives going on.. noones tracking him.
even though he has almost zero sp. and he also is voting nonstop / and he is voting 0.01 percent how could he be removing way less from every persons posts. his 0.00000000001% vote how much could really be stripped.
It does have an effect. I realized whenever he votes on my post first, it’s either I get $0.01 or nothing. You can check out my posts. My achievement 3 he didn’t vote and I got $2.31. I just made my achievement 4 yesterday and he’s the first person to vote and now am having only $0.01. No one minds me
you are not comparing the two things on equal terms... Your saying one post had 2 dollars payout 1 had 1 cent payout... i looked... your 1 cent payout had 2 votes yourself and him... the other one had a BUNCH of votes because they were posted to a community... as part of an achievement which people are ready and waiting to upvote your post...
the only way to know is to have 2 posts with the exact same people vote at the exact same times with the exact same sp
or you can just accept the fact that 1 person voting your post up has no effect on your post payout... i dont care what you say. 1 person voting your post with no sp will not have any effect on your post.
if it did have the effect your saying. then he would have shut the entire blockchain down... because he basically votes every post that goes out.
Ofcourse it doenst shut down the blockchain but his anoying little upvotes DO have an huge impact because he votes after a few seconds....
Because of his actions the curators make almost nothing (6.52% instead of the normal 49 -50%)
Im not saying he cant upvote anything to "keep his legacy" here on steemit im just saying to change the fact that it hurts other people is causing his "legacy" to be EXTREMELY anoying and certainly not helping his causes and believes.
So please @sqube stop being a little shit and fucking everyone over like your complaining about in your post that other people are fucking shit over.
@joshh71390, @realhavenn, @mosin-nagant
i just dont think that HE is the reason that 43 percent of the post payout was returned. Thats about 5 steem payout i doubt his miniscule account can be causing millions in losses across the board but if thats what you think then this blockchain needs a new fork, becuase thats a very easy way to esentially destroy someones earnings. why not do it with 1000 accounts put 1 steem on each and just shut the entire network down.
** as my understanding hes losing his own curation???
How is the reward pool split between authors and curators?
Up to 50% of a post's payout is awarded to curators (the people who upvoted the post) as a reward for discovering the content. The other 50% is awarded to the author.
If curators vote for a post within the first 5 minutes of it being created, a portion of their curation reward remains in the rewards pool for other authors/curators. This portion is linear to the age of the post between 0 and 5 minutes. As an example: upvoting at two minutes will donate 60% of your potential curation reward back to the rewards pool.