You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: SC-S29 | Geo-Quest Mystery – Week 5 : Route of Clues
Thank you for your participation in SC-S29 | Geo-Quest Mystery – Week 5: Route of Clues.
Here is the evaluation of @sanaullahkhan1 – “SC-S29 | Geo-Quest Mystery – Week 5 : Route of Clues”, following the official Week 5 rubric.
Evaluation Summary
| Criteria | Score | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| 1. SteemAtlas Pin & Route Description | 1.2 / 2.0 | The route is clearly explained (home → industrial area road → college gate → inside to workshop) and the travel time is provided (15–20 minutes). However, the Week 5 requirement includes a SteemAtlas pin code/coordinates shown in the post. In the content provided here, the SteemAtlas pin/coordinates are not visible, so this part cannot be fully confirmed. Improvement: include the SteemAtlas pin code with coordinates and add a clearer “how to retrace” description (key turns/landmarks or central pin reference). |
| 2. Creativity of Mission & Hidden Order Puzzle (A→B→C) | 0.2 / 2.0 | You present three moments (road movement, main gate/classroom, HVACR workshop), but Week 5 requires a hidden order puzzle where readers must deduce the correct sequence from clues (and the text should not present it too directly). Here the sequence is straightforward and there is no intentional puzzle mechanism. Improvement: mix the three moments in your writing and add subtle hints (before/after, sound changes, timing like 11:00 break and 11:30 practical) so readers can reconstruct A→B→C. |
| 3. Speem.watch Proof Video (20–60s) – Three Moments in Sequence | 0.0 / 2.5 | The required Speem.watch proof video (20–60 seconds) showing the three moments in order is missing. Without the Speem.watch video (or direct link/embed), the entry cannot be validated for this criterion. |
| 4. Storytelling Quality (Walking the Route) | 1.7 / 2.5 | The narrative is clear and meaningful, showing a strong daily-life progression from motion to focus to skill. The contrast of sounds (traffic vs. workshop tools) is effective. To score higher, add more route-walk details (what you pass first, what you see at the gate, how the environment changes step-by-step) and create a more immersive “walk with me” flow. |
| 5. Engagement (Solve others’ routes / thoughtful comments) | 0.2 / 1.0 | You reply to comments under your own post, which shows interaction. However, Week 5 engagement rewards solving other participants’ order puzzles in their comment sections (at least two). No evidence of that is shown here. Improvement: comment on at least two other Week 5 entries and guess their A→B→C order with reasoning. |
Final Score: 3.3 / 10
Remarks
This is a strong real-life route with clear learning value and three logical moments. The main reasons for the low score are missing Week 5 required elements: the Speem.watch proof video and the hidden order puzzle format. Adding the Speem.watch video (20–60s) and redesigning the text into a true “order puzzle” would significantly improve the result.
— Geo-Quest Mystery Jury