rewind on it : but i prefer to be "against a ccp decision" than have "higher than ccp"

ccp says no

fine.

i accept.

as the "no" is sovereign, no higher up

nothing above...

way simpler

reverse in a "yes"

the same...

the end...

stop at the feat of the Paramount leader.

in the whole CCP ONE china processes

the final.

none "to be approved by higher"

nope.

way more liveable....

no "hidden" no "strings"

nothing

the end.

"the puck ends at putin"

the ideal of ru.v2

fought by the rMFA

to impose teh "global sherpas over"

the cnMFA, a small organization in the wide CCP framework...

well framed....

no debate to have...

decision, correct or not, final... in the sense there, the authority effective, appliaying etc...

there.

then too easier in case of correction course to implement... direct feedback....

not for the "string pullers"

change QoL....

then normal, to not "agree" on all, but if already, the "Ones" stoping all...

"social dictatorship"

then asking why etc... dialogue, as long as the enforcement is clear... the "who" ....

"he is on the wall"

^^

way easier... understandable, clear by nature, no shame no trick, no nothing, said and that's it.

again the end of long processes to decide... "not at the whim of wind"

serious...

and "sabotage" older than the 3 kingdoms... normal, severly reprimanded....

the interests of the new (rejuvenating and modernizing) republic, not of "some".

the PEOPLE notion... from PBoC to PLA.... to CCP... or there the CPCP ...

same same at the end, a spirit...

normal

can't be else

for the responsible of the mandate of heavens... traditional, the "son of heaven", his "world" decision, final.

opposition is futile... useless, illorsory... the dialogue different... with the proper channels....

anyway...

china = cheering !

again would you want or even think to "sabotage" internally ?

very cheering !

anyway

hf... (and death to json all those java shit)