You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Sexual Liberation and the Relationship Evolution

in #sexual-freedom • 10 years ago

Given that your own sources say k/r is defunct... Go ahead amd write that post.

lost importance in the early 1990s, when it was criticized by several empirical studies.[4][5] A life-history paradigm has replaced the r/K selection paradigm

Won't change the fact that you're making giant, incorrect assumptions in order to fit your beliefs.

Polyamory doesn't mean more kids and less attention. It means alternative arrangements for relationships. A "monogamous" father might have a mistress while a polyamorous father would simply be honest about having a second girlfriend. Literally no difference between the two as to how kids are raised.

10 years ago in #sexual-freedom by
100%
    10%25%50%75%100%
    $0.00
      Reply 2
      Sort:  
    • Trending
      • [-]
       10 years ago 

      I did make the post, check it out if you want and feel free to correct anything im wrong about in it. it is always good to learn how I was wrong about something.
      cheers!

      [-]
       10 years ago (edited)

      lol, lost importance is not the same as defunct. -smh-

      also you chopped up that quote. it says it has been criticized. if you understood what it was you would understand why it is criticized and is actually banned from ted talks, yahoo and google. because if you use the r vs k structure with race it becomes very "raciest". also the link you took that quote from is Wikipedia. Wikipedia is a quick refrence, the basis to start your research not the end of the line for most, considering it changes weekly by people that don't always know what they are talking about. here is the full quote not distorted like you did to it,

      The theory was popular in the 1970s and 1980s, when it was used as a heuristic device, but lost importance in the early 1990s, when it was criticized by several empirical studies. A life-history paradigm has replaced the r/K selection paradigm but continues to incorporate many of its important themes.

      so if you look at a life history paradigm it is almost the exact same, in fact it is basdes of rvsk. only has reproducitive risks and reproductive timing added to it basically. it is all based off r vs k

      its fine you obiously are going to keep pushing your narrative no matter how much proof I supply and im going to continue to write this post no matter how much you push r selective ideas.

      maby check out my post on it. prolly wont be dne till tomorrow im hella tired and already after 2am. at worst you will waste a little it reading something and them moving on laughing at my silliness right?

      have a good night and hopefully talk to you soon. also sorry I often come off as an asshole.

      also none of your picts load