Talk Channel: "Comment or ask a question"/ Comente o pregunte (week 326) in the WOX
The idea of "Talk Channel"
The Talk channel was created to share ideas and address any questions or concerns you may have. It's open to everyone; therefore, I invite you to participate by sharing your concerns, questions, answers, and ideas related to the platform.
"Talk channel" se creó para compartir ideas y responder a cualquier pregunta o inquietud que puedan tener. Está abierto a todos; por lo tanto, los invito a participar compartiendo sus inquietudes, preguntas, respuestas e ideas relacionadas con la plataforma.
Theme this week:
| # | Questions, Answers and Comments | Preguntas, Respuestas y Comentarios |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | What reasons would you have for deciding to delegate all your Steem Power? | ¿Qué razones tendrías para decidir delegar todo tu Steem Power? |
| 2 | If we had to name some projects or businesses that have positively and negatively influenced Steemit, what would they be and why? | Si tuviéramos que nombrar algunos proyectos o negocios que hayan influido positiva y negativamente en Steemit, ¿cuáles serían y por qué? |
| 3 | Without needing to do a professional technical analysis, what can we say about the current state of Steem in the market? Which other cryptocurrency would you compare it to? | Sin necesidad de realizar un análisis técnico profesional, ¿qué podemos decir sobre el estado actual de Steem en el mercado? ¿Con qué otra criptomoneda la compararías? |
These and other points we can discuss during this week.
Estos y otros puntos los podemos discutir durante esta semana.
Participate by leaving your comments, questions or answers here.
Participa, dejando su comentario, preguntas o respuestas aquí.
Everyone is invited to speak on the topics of their choice.
| Tell us a little bit about your "experience, criteria and/or doubts" regarding the Steemit platform, have the opportunity to answer or join other comments that the community may be making in the channel. | Cuéntanos un poco sobre tu "experiencia, criterio y/o dudas" con respecto a la plataforma Steemit, ten la oportunidad de responder o unirte a otros comentarios que la comunidad pueda estar haciendo en el canal. |
|---|
We also invite other connoisseurs of the subject to present themselves here on "Talk Channel"."
In the "talk channel" we or you can also post a topic that needs a review, for example tools on Steem or other things you want to know about
Responsibility moderator for "Talk Channel" is @adeljose
Regards
@mister-omortson @stef1 @sultan-aceh @franyeligonzalez @axeman @xpilar @bambuka @petface @hardphotographer and @adeljose
I don’t think I have an answer to the three questions above. It all depends on my mood and on how much I feel I need my SP for something else. In any case, I would never give away all my SP, though I might give away some of it – perhaps to give the communities I support a greater say, since mine doesn’t really count for much in practice. I don’t actually think it works very well, and that the upvotes I receive make much of a difference.
As for point two, I can’t really say anything either; everything that’s been tried seems to be good in some way, but never really works out; at the moment, it also appears that a lot of things still don’t work. As usual, we’re learning to live with it – that’s at least something you can say.
I haven’t compared Steem to other cryptos for a long time now, simply because I don’t have the opportunity to buy or sell it. That solution still isn’t there. The only thing I see now and then is that the value seems to be rising. Let’s see if this trend continues and whether burning SBI has a positive effect, but even if that were the case, I still think the big whales and the scammers are draining the pool.
The need for money increases. Even without all those wars 98% of the world's population lives by the day and never learned how to make a budget and how to save for those rainy days.
I've seen that if we consider giving votes with our entire SP, it can yield better returns than delegation services. Regarding communities, some people take advantage of the system to give themselves 100% of their votes with the community account, which I consider an abuse.
It's true, I share your opinion; there have been some good initiatives. Recently, I can highlight Steem Atlas, which, despite the decrease in the number of posts about it, showed great momentum on the platform.
It is the wish of all Steemites that Steem continues to rise, unfortunately it is still very low from its average level. Now that you are naming the wars, this one has drastically influenced the market, we will be attentive to new events regarding Steem.
Grateful for sharing with us on this channel.
I agree that there are who give themselves a 100% upvote and not the ten times of what they delegated,if they delegated at all. Besides those who receive their votes are the end of the run will always receive fewer than those who receive a vote if the SP is still over 90+.
I assume only a few will always win if they give all their SP to someone else and blcan build entire houses and have holidays in the Bahamas no matter where they live or if there's a war. Just for a very small group Steemit turns out to be good. The rest of belongs to the cattle living with the hope to receive an upvote of a few cents.
Now I speak you ..how can it be that Steemit doesn't pay out the amount to the author as mentioned underneath a post?
It's always fewer, I could say way fewer and now I don't talk about that a part goes to curators or is paid out in SP. Is the calculation wrong or does take Steemit a bigger share than it tells its users?
It's not steemit that pays out, it's the steem blockchain
steemit is just a font-end
I believe you know what I mean: is the calculation shown still old, misleadin, not updated? Does no one care, because no one, well only a few, takes the time to calculate and check (I know I don't).
The blockchain can only payout a calculation set ... Set by humans.
Why is it that those who are already rewarded more generously can keep a higher percentage?
Sounds like the real world... Or should I say the freedom tax (plans) in the Netherlands where the poor pay the biggest percentage.
cc @almaguer
Every interface has a direct relationship with the underlying blockchain. The interface simply makes it easier for the user to access services that would otherwise be endless code, hindering access for a large number of clients or users. What good is an interface if what it advertises doesn't match reality?
Let's see what the answer will be
Posts that earn more than 20 steem get a slightly higher payout than posts that earn less than 20 steem
Since this is a question from @almaguer and he is a professor in maths I will forward your answer. But I am sure he never received any down vote plus rarely votes. According to his calculations out of the 7+ dollars that should be paid out he didn't even receive 3. That's a huge difference. He also liked to know if this is only the case with him (he is Cuban).
Thanks for taking the time to answer @xpilar, but I doubt one of these are the reason.
❤️
Hi,
It's a generic answer. It doesn't add anything.
What kind of answer is that saying that if you get more votes you receive more, and if you get fewer votes you receive less? If you get more candies, you have more. If you don't get any candies, you don't get any.
The question is, how come a post worth about $10 (in Steem currency) doesn't even receive $3?
@xpilar and @adeljose can you answer this?
Please, also answer his other two questions:
Noticeable as in the part that isn't payout by to the author
@ety001 @moecki
I don't know what that means. Is this question related to a specific post? If yes, I need a permlink to check the amounts.
@almaguer
I made a post about it that you can share with others
https://steemit.com/hive185836/@xpilar/steem-payouts-are-not-what-you-think-important-for-everyone
Greetings, friend Wake.
The explanation provided by our friend @xpilar can be easily viewed on Steemworld; take a look at the following:
The real value of your post is $0.359 so far.
The larger the amounts, the more noticeable it is. They should then reveal the whole truth. Everything related to blockchain shouldn't be transparent.
cool