You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Talk Channel: "Comment or ask a question"/ Comente o pregunte (week 326) in the WOX

in WORLD OF XPILARlast month (edited)

I don’t think I have an answer to the three questions above. It all depends on my mood and on how much I feel I need my SP for something else. In any case, I would never give away all my SP, though I might give away some of it – perhaps to give the communities I support a greater say, since mine doesn’t really count for much in practice. I don’t actually think it works very well, and that the upvotes I receive make much of a difference.

As for point two, I can’t really say anything either; everything that’s been tried seems to be good in some way, but never really works out; at the moment, it also appears that a lot of things still don’t work. As usual, we’re learning to live with it – that’s at least something you can say.

I haven’t compared Steem to other cryptos for a long time now, simply because I don’t have the opportunity to buy or sell it. That solution still isn’t there. The only thing I see now and then is that the value seems to be rising. Let’s see if this trend continues and whether burning SBI has a positive effect, but even if that were the case, I still think the big whales and the scammers are draining the pool.

The need for money increases. Even without all those wars 98% of the world's population lives by the day and never learned how to make a budget and how to save for those rainy days.

Sort:  
 last month 

I don't actually think it works very well, and that the upvotes I receive make much of a difference.

I've seen that if we consider giving votes with our entire SP, it can yield better returns than delegation services. Regarding communities, some people take advantage of the system to give themselves 100% of their votes with the community account, which I consider an abuse.

As for point two, I can't really say anything either; everything that's been tried seems to be good in some way, but never really works out; at the moment, it also appears that a lot of things still don't work. As usual, we're learning to live with it – that's at least something you can say.

It's true, I share your opinion; there have been some good initiatives. Recently, I can highlight Steem Atlas, which, despite the decrease in the number of posts about it, showed great momentum on the platform.

I haven't compared Steem to other cryptos for a long time now, simply because I don't have the opportunity to buy or sell it. That solution still isn't there. The only thing I see now and then is that the value seems to be rising. Let's see if this trend continues and whether burning SBI has a positive effect, but even if that were the case, I still think the big whales and the scammers are draining the pool.

The need for money increases. Even without all those wars 98% of the world's population lives by the day and never learned how to make a budget and how to save for those rainy days.

It is the wish of all Steemites that Steem continues to rise, unfortunately it is still very low from its average level. Now that you are naming the wars, this one has drastically influenced the market, we will be attentive to new events regarding Steem.

Grateful for sharing with us on this channel.

I agree that there are who give themselves a 100% upvote and not the ten times of what they delegated,if they delegated at all. Besides those who receive their votes are the end of the run will always receive fewer than those who receive a vote if the SP is still over 90+.
I assume only a few will always win if they give all their SP to someone else and blcan build entire houses and have holidays in the Bahamas no matter where they live or if there's a war. Just for a very small group Steemit turns out to be good. The rest of belongs to the cattle living with the hope to receive an upvote of a few cents.

Now I speak you ..how can it be that Steemit doesn't pay out the amount to the author as mentioned underneath a post?
It's always fewer, I could say way fewer and now I don't talk about that a part goes to curators or is paid out in SP. Is the calculation wrong or does take Steemit a bigger share than it tells its users?

 last month (edited)

It's not steemit that pays out, it's the steem blockchain

steemit is just a font-end

I believe you know what I mean: is the calculation shown still old, misleadin, not updated? Does no one care, because no one, well only a few, takes the time to calculate and check (I know I don't).

The blockchain can only payout a calculation set ... Set by humans.
Why is it that those who are already rewarded more generously can keep a higher percentage?

Sounds like the real world... Or should I say the freedom tax (plans) in the Netherlands where the poor pay the biggest percentage.

cc @almaguer

Every interface has a direct relationship with the underlying blockchain. The interface simply makes it easier for the user to access services that would otherwise be endless code, hindering access for a large number of clients or users. What good is an interface if what it advertises doesn't match reality?

Let's see what the answer will be

 last month (edited)

If a post receives more upvotes, the potential payout of the post can go up.
If a post receives more downvotes, the potential payout of the post can go down.
If other posts receive more upvotes, the potential payout of the post can go down.
If other posts receive more downvotes, the potential payout of the post can go up.
If upvotes are removed from a post, the potential payout of the post can go down.
If downvotes are removed from a post, the potential payout of the post can go up.
If the price of STEEM goes up, the potential payout of all posts can go up.
If the price of STEEM goes down, the potential payout of all posts can go down.

Posts that earn more than 20 steem get a slightly higher payout than posts that earn less than 20 steem

Since this is a question from @almaguer and he is a professor in maths I will forward your answer. But I am sure he never received any down vote plus rarely votes. According to his calculations out of the 7+ dollars that should be paid out he didn't even receive 3. That's a huge difference. He also liked to know if this is only the case with him (he is Cuban).

Thanks for taking the time to answer @xpilar, but I doubt one of these are the reason.

❤️

Hi,
It's a generic answer. It doesn't add anything.
What kind of answer is that saying that if you get more votes you receive more, and if you get fewer votes you receive less? If you get more candies, you have more. If you don't get any candies, you don't get any.
The question is, how come a post worth about $10 (in Steem currency) doesn't even receive $3?

@xpilar and @adeljose can you answer this?

Please, also answer his other two questions:

The question is, how come a post worth about $10 (in Steem currency) doesn't even receive $3?

Every interface has a direct relationship with the underlying blockchain. The interface simply makes it easier for the user to access services that would otherwise be endless code, hindering access for a large number of clients or users. What good is an interface if what it advertises doesn't match reality?

The larger the amounts, the more noticeable it is. They should then reveal the whole truth. Everything related to blockchain shouldn't be transparent.

Noticeable as in the part that isn't payout by to the author

@ety001 @moecki

Loading...
 27 days ago (edited)

The question is, how come a post worth about $10 (in Steem currency) doesn't even receive $3?

I don't know what that means. Is this question related to a specific post? If yes, I need a permlink to check the amounts.

@almaguer

 26 days ago (edited)

Greetings, friend Wake.

The explanation provided by our friend @xpilar can be easily viewed on Steemworld; take a look at the following:

image.png

image.png

The real value of your post is $0.359 so far.

I am not talking about my post but about @almaguer's. Did you read his question? He knows about steemworld.org but cannot figure out why a post with a reward of over 10 dollars doesn't even pay out 30%.

If that is the case it would be good to show another calculation underneath the posts.

Are you saying that the earnings mentioned underneath everyone's post aren't dollars but Steem?

cc @almaguer

The larger the amounts, the more noticeable it is. They should then reveal the whole truth. Everything related to blockchain shouldn't be transparent.